Cyber sex chatbots
Both domain names were previously registered and managed by Go Daddy Operating Company, LLC.
Suddenly, an unidentified and unauthorized person used the name and the password of the company manager to log into his account and transfer the Domain names to another Registrant and Registrar (Online NIC, Inc.).
wrongful taking of control of a domain name from the rightful name holder.” The present contribution describes the types of domain thefts (Section 2) and explains the possibilities for recovery of stolen domain names (Section 3). The Domain Hijacking report differentiates five basic types of domain theft, namely: impersonation of a domain name registrant in correspondence with a domain name registrar (Subsection 2.1); forgery of a registrant’s account information maintained by a registrar (Subsection 2.2), forgery of a transfer authorization communication from a registrant to a registrar (Subsection 2.3); impersonation or a fraudulent act that leads to the unauthorized transfer of a domain from a rightful name holder to another party (Subsection 2.4), and unauthorized DNS configuration changes that disrupt or damage services operated under a domain name (Subsection 2.5).
This type of domain theft includes using forged fax or postal mail requests to modify registrant information.
In this case, the motive of the thief is not to immediately disrupt the domain holder’s operation, but to acquire and resell the domain name.
An example of such a theft is the blogtemplate4and incident.
The court justified the award by stating that, in the five years the defendant operated the “sex.com” website, he reaped profits amounting to more than 40 million dollars.
In April 2005, a domain name thief convinced the support staff of Network Solutions, Inc.
Unauthorized DNS configuration changes can be a result of DNS spoofing attacks (also known as DNS cache poisoning).
In this kind of attack, data is introduced into a Domain Name System (DNS) name server’s cache database that results in the domain name server returning an incorrect IP address, diverting traffic to another computer (often the computer of the domain name thief).
2.4 Impersonation or a fraudulent act that leads to the unauthorized transfer of a domain name from a rightful name holder to another party This type of domain name theft includes actions that may or not may lead to changes in the DNS configuration.
If the theft does not lead to changes in the DNS configuration, it could remain undetected for a considerable period of time.This type of domain theft includes acts where the domain name thief submits a fake transfer authorization communication to the registrar. case found that the defendant fraudulently obtained the registration of the domain name by sending a forged letter to Network Solutions, Inc., the domain registrar.